

Architectural photography and real estate shoots aren’t the same
So what makes them different?
Architectural Photography
Goal: To artistically tell the story of a space for high-end assets or press
Intended for long-term marketing or publishing
Focused on an artistic approach to showcase an asset’s design features
Takes more time to stylize, declutter, etc. and ultimately produces fewer images
High-end editing, retouching and styling that goes beyond basic edits to perfect individual images
More likely to benefit from cost-sharing (more details below)
Real Estate Photography
Goal: To sell, lease or market a building or property
Shorter life-cycle driven by immediate listing or campaign needs
Focused on depicting the space or property itself
Provides many images and angles of an asset to reveal multiple property spaces and amenities
Often uses wider angle lenses to show as much of each space as possible
Basic editing and retouching
Usually faster delivery of final images
How do I know which style is best for my project?
-
Consider Your Asset
Is this a trophy asset or renovation? Is there a stand-out amenity feature that could benefit from higher-touch photography? Are you hoping to sell the feeling of what it’s like to work in a building rather than just the building or space itself?
-
Consider Your Audience
Who are you trying to attract? Does this target audience expect a certain level of quality?
-
Consider Your Budget
Do you need cost-effective photography quickly to support an upcoming marketing campaign roll-out? Or do you have time to invest in high-impact, editorial style photography for a high-end, coffee table look-book approach to property showcase?
-
Consider Cost-Sharing
Are you interested in architecture photography? Perhaps your project partners are too. Clients frequently split the overall cost of architectural shoots so that architects, developers, interior designers, lighting companies, etc. simultaneously obtain image licenses and dramatically decrease costs per party.